ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Impact of electrode distance, axial position, and energization time on cauterization of root canal isthmuses using high-frequency current.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis in vitro proof-of-concept study evaluated how the isthmus gap width, distance between electrodes, and duration of high-frequency electrical current application affect surface morphological changes of simulated isthmus inner surfaces. MATERIALS AND
methodsSimulated isthmus models were prepared using bovine dentin blocks immersed in Plank-Rychlo solution to create organic layers. Isthmus gap widths of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm were created. Two root canals were prepared at distances of 2 mm or 5 mm, creating six groups (n = 10 each). Root canals were filled with NaOCl, and #35 K-files served as electrodes. A high-frequency current (225 V, 520 kHz) was applied for 5 or 10 s. The demineralized surface morphology (decalcified surface) prior to HFC application served as the baseline reference for evaluating cauterization outcomes. Isthmus surfaces were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.
resultsHigh-frequency current application produced surface morphological changes consistent with cauterization, including exposure of dentinal tubules. Fisher's exact test showed significant differences in cauterization rates, since Group 1 showed less organic residue than Groups 4 and 5 (p < 0.05). In Groups 3 and 4, 10-s application significantly decreased organic material compared to 5-s application (p < 0.001). Ordinal logistic regression analysis confirmed that electrode distance (OR = 0.854, p < 0.0001), axial position (OR = 0.444, p < 0.0001), and energization time (OR = 3.276, p < 0.0001) were significant predictors, whereas gap width was not (p = 0.542). Coronal regions showed significantly higher cauterization rates than apical regions (91.6% [466/509] vs 68.2% [347/509]).
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this in vitro proof-of-concept study, electrode distance, axial position, and energization time significantly influenced surface morphological outcomes. Extending energization time from 5 to 10 s increased the odds of achieving higher-grade surface morphological changes by 3.3-fold. Gap width did not significantly affect the outcome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Electrode distance, axial position, and energization time are critical parameters for high-frequency cauterization of simulated root canal isthmuses. These proof-of-concept findings may inform future investigations into the clinical application of this technique for areas inaccessible to conventional instrumentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42234213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.