ArticleMycorrhiza2026
Optimization of a high-throughput single spore DNA extraction protocol for the model species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Rhizophagus irregularis.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single spore DNA extraction methods of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) typically involve manually crushing spores to release the DNA into solution. However, there are no consistent protocols for DNA extraction from single spores, nor methods for extracting DNA from many single spores at once. We tested several single spore DNA extraction methods on four isolates of the species Rhizophagus irregularis in 96-well plates: direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR), freeze-thaw, manually crushing, bead beating, and chemical lysis. The extracted DNA was amplified via PCR and visualized using gel electrophoresis. We evaluated each method based on cost, time efficiency, preparation effort, safety, ease, and number of spores with successful DNA extraction and amplification. Overall, we found that crushing spores using a sewing needle had the greatest success for all four isolates and can be easily conducted in 250µL 96-well plates. The direct PCR and freeze-thaw methods show promise of being practical high-throughput methods for single spore DNA extraction; however, they should be further tested on other isolates and species to account for both intra and interspecies variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42234198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.