ArticleRheumatology international2026
Positive physician perceptions of structured lung ultrasound (LUS) training in interstitial lung disease (ILD): a post-workshop survey study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend structured training in lung ultrasound (LUS) for interstitial lung disease (ILD). Therefore, this exploratory study evaluated physician perceptions, perceived educational value, and self-reported applicability of a structured LUS workshop involving patients with ILD. A six-hour LUS workshop combining didactic lectures with supervised hands-on training on ILD patients was conducted for a group of actively practicing rheumatologists and pulmonologists. Workshop evaluation was performed using an anonymous questionnaire capturing participants' demographics and pre-course LUS practice, course satisfaction, and perceived barriers to using LUS routinely in ILD care. Ten physicians, predominantly experienced rheumatologists with regular exposure to ILD patients, attended the workshop. Pre-course LUS was infrequent, with only one participant reporting regular use. Following the workshop, all participants reported perceived improvement in LUS knowledge and increased self-confidence in recognizing typical sonographic features of ILD. The workshop was universally rated as clinically relevant, and nine of ten attendees expressed intention to integrate LUS into their clinical practice. Lack of experience and time constraints were identified as main perceived barriers, whereas standardized protocols and focused training were viewed as important facilitators for clinical adoption of LUS in ILD. This exploratory study suggests that a concise, structured LUS workshop involving patients with ILD was perceived as clinically relevant and educationally valuable by participating physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.