Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234168›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Longitudinal assessment and predictors of subjective taste change after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

Allan J Hovan, Michael T Brennan, Bengt Hasséus, Judith E Raber-Durlacher, Marie-Charlotte Huysmans, Alexa M G A Laheij, Stephanie J M van Leeuwen, Karin Garming Legert, Scott Isom, David M Kline and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Allan J HovanDepartment of Oral Oncology and Dentistry, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1639-5281
Michael T BrennanDepartment of Oral Medicine/Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. mike.brennan@advocatehealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-4335
Bengt HasséusDepartment of Oral Medicine and Pathology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3088-1550
Judith E Raber-DurlacherDepartment of Oral Medicine, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1500-8390
Marie-Charlotte HuysmansDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3036-7554
Alexa M G A LaheijDepartment of Oral Medicine, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-2798
Stephanie J M van LeeuwenDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-3705
Karin Garming LegertDepartment of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddlinge, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8276-0510
Scott IsomDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6658-3865
David M KlineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6183-3303
Nicole M A BlijlevensDepartment of Hematology, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-2072
Jan-Erik JohanssonSection of Hematology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-9955
Inger von BültzingslöwenDepartment of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5509-4954

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at Wake ForestUM1TR004929 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jamy D Ard, KRISTIE L FOLEY · 2024 to 2026
$11.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of this investigation within the Orastem study were to describe the prevalence of subjective taste change, levels of patient-reported distress associated with taste change, and factors predicting taste change after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with a particular focus on factors predictive of severe and/or persistent (present at 12 months) taste change.

methodsAltogether, 238 patients at five cancer centers were followed during HCT hospitalization and up to 12 months post-HCT. Patients with taste change were compared to non-affected patients with respect to gender, age, transplant type, previous chemotherapy, conditioning regimen(s), oral mucositis, pre-HCT salivary flow, oral hygiene status and, in allogeneic HCT recipients, chronic oral graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Distress from taste change was also evaluated.

resultsDuring hospitalization, taste change was reported by over one-third (81/238) of patients to an open question on oral symptoms; of these, 41% reported taste change as their worst/most bothersome oral symptom. To a specific question on distress due to taste change, 76% of all patients reported some level of distress. Taste change from previous chemotherapy and full intensity conditioning were risk factors for severe taste change during hospitalization. At three months, allogeneic transplant patients reported a higher rate of severe taste change compared to autologous transplant patients. Increased age predicted severe taste change at 6 and 12-month follow-up. At twelve months, 13.1% of patients reported distress from taste change.

conclusionThis study confirmed taste change as a common clinical complaint post-HCT. Taste change remained a significant issue for a small subset of patients at 12 months. Further research is required to develop effective preventive and management strategies for this common oral side-effect post-HCT.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTaste DisordersAdultAgedFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsStomatitisTransplantation ConditioningYoung AdultDysgeusiaHCTHematopoietic cell transplantIncidenceRisk factorsTaste changes

Identifiers

PMID42234168
PMCPMC13233654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.