Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Early effect of CFTR modulators on the mental health of patients with cystic fibrosis and parents.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental health, sleep, and quality of life following CFTR modulator therapy: a longitudinal study of children with cystic fibrosis and caregivers.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators were shown to improve clinical symptoms in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, the effects of modulator therapy on the mental health of patients with CF remain uncertain. We aimed to investigate the impact of the CFTR modulator therapy on the mental health of children with CF and their parents. This prospective observational study was conducted on children with CF who used modulator therapy (Group 1, n = 24) and those who did not (Group 2, n = 29) and parents (n, 53). Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (CFQ-R), Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), and Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) were applied to patients. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) were administered to parents. There was no significant difference between the groups in demographics. SCARED scores were higher in patients who did not use modulator therapy (p = 0.016). Anxiety and depression scores of BDI and BAI scales applied to parents were found to be statistically significantly higher in parents of patients who did not use modulator therapy (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, respectively). WHOQOL-BREF scores were higher among parents of patients who used modulator therapy, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.060).
conclusionThese findings suggest a possible association between CFTR modulator use and lower anxiety and depression scores in both patients and parents, though causal conclusions cannot be drawn from this observational study. WHAT IS KNOWN: • CFTR modulator therapies have been increasingly used in recent years with demonstrated beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. • The effects of CFTR modulator therapies on mental health are not yet clearly defined. WHAT IS NEW: • CFTR modulator use was associated with lower anxiety scores in children with cystic fibrosis and lower anxiety and depression scores among their parents. • These findings suggest a potential early psychosocial benefit of CFTR modulator therapy for both patients and caregivers; however, they should be interpreted cautiously because the observational design does not allow causal conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42234158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.