ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Effectiveness and Adherence Determinants of Digital Pelvic Floor Interventions in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisDespite increasing use of digital pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the form of apps and web-based programmes, their effectiveness and adherence determinants during pregnancy and the postpartum period remain unclear. This review evaluated effectiveness for preventing and managing pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), identified adherence determinants, and integrated findings using behaviour change theory.
methodsA mixed methods systematic review was conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute convergent segregated approach. PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 2025; updated January 2026. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Primary outcome was PFD symptom severity, including incontinence, prolapse symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and perineal pain. Quantitative data were analysed using meta-analysis where possible, otherwise narrative synthesis. Qualitative data were synthesized using meta-aggregation and integrated using the capability-opportunity-motivation-behaviour model and behaviour change wheel.
resultsEighteen studies involving 4916 participants were included. Digital PFMT was associated with reduced urinary incontinence during pregnancy. Postpartum effects were mixed, with no pooled effect and substantial heterogeneity (MD -1.45, 95% CI -3.17 to 0.27). Qualitative synthesis yielded five adherence determinants: knowledge and confidence, emotional/contextual demands, healthcare communication, sociocultural influences, and programme usability. Integration indicated that variability in effectiveness likely reflects differences in capability, opportunity, and motivation rather than intervention content alone, clarifying behavioural pathways to consider in intervention development.
conclusionsDigital PFMT may support pelvic floor outcomes during pregnancy and postpartum, but effectiveness depends on addressing capability, opportunity, and motivation. Mixed evidence underscores the need for theory-informed interventions targeting behavioural mechanisms that sustain engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42234137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.