Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234109›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Experience with standardized assessments in child and adolescent psychiatry: Findings from a national trainee survey in Switzerland.

Matthias Liebrand, Maya Cosentino, Michael Kaess, Stephan Eliez, CAP Residents Consortium, Paul Klauser, Jochen Kindler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias Liebrand *University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1139-5151
Maya Cosentino *University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-5836
Michael KaessUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0031-7764
Stephan EliezDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Fondation Pôle Autisme, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-3028
CAP Residents Consortium
Paul Klauser *Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. paul.klauser@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-4947
Jochen Kindler *University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-2770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current shortage of child and adolescent mental health specialists in Europe and around the world, coupled with an increasing mental health burden among young people poses significant challenges that future child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) training programs must address. Promoting the use of standardized assessments (SA) has the potential to improve both efficiency and quality of patient care as well as resident training programs. This study aimed to characterize a sample of CAP trainees (residents and assistant psychologists) in Switzerland and evaluate their SA use as well as their corresponding skills and attitudes. The project was launched at the Swiss CAP Association Residents' Day 2022 in Zurich, where the development of a national survey was initiated. The survey was subsequently refined and distributed to all CAP training facilities in Switzerland. The final sample included 73 residents and 121 assistant psychologists. The majority of trainees from both groups reported being interested in using SA and convinced of their clinical usefulness. Common reasons for using SA in clinical practice were to support objectivity, structure clinical interviews, and address sensitive topics with patients. Participants' SA use varied by type of psychotherapy training but did not differ by type of institution (university vs. non-university hospital) or academic degree. Self-rated ability to administer SA correlated positively with SA training opportunities. A frequently reported use barrier was the lack of SA translations. Based on our findings, CAP would benefit from teaching and promoting SA as a seminal, evidence-based practice in clinical and training program contexts.

Indexed as

Assistant psychologistsChild and adolescent psychiatryResidentsStandardized assessmentsTraineesTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.