Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234105›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2026

App-Based Cardiology Education for Pediatric Residents.

Jonathan Pacella, Ryan A Moore, Elisa Marcuccio, Michael E Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan PacellaThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ryan A MooreThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Elisa MarcuccioThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Michael E KimDivision of Cardiac Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. michael.kim@seattlechildrens.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric cardiology education requires mastery of physiology, anatomy, and spatial reasoning. There is limited published data on pediatric cardiology education for medical trainees. Mobile applications have emerged as a new asynchronous option to supplement formal medical education. We performed an acceptability study using a mobile educational app, Heartpedia™ (HP) to assess itsusefulness to learners in CHD education. This was a single center prospective cohort study of pediatric interns during their cardiology rotation. Individuals were given a tutorial on how to install and use HP but were not required. Surveys and tests were administered before and after their month-long rotation. The tests contained questions based on two cardiac lesions: a perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) and Truncus Arteriosus (TA) Type 1. 53 pediatric interns participated in the study with 66% reported to have used HP. App usage correlated with lesion test score improvement for TA but not VSD. >80% of learners described HP as a helpful, easy to use educational resource for learners, and agreed it improved their understanding of CHD lesions and their management. The Heartpedia™ application was used by most residents during their rotation and found it helpful for their understanding of anatomy and physiology and yielded improved understanding of complex CHD. While app usage showed some improvement in knowledge gains on certain cardiac lesions, further study is warranted to assess the efficacy of mobile learning applications for CHD education.

Indexed as

App based learningCardiac anatomyMedical education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.