ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Intraosseous pressure measurement of cystic bone lesions and comparison with normal marrow.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo (1) measure intraosseous pressure (IOP) in cystic bone lesions and compare it with pressure values in normal bone marrow from a previous cohort; (2) to investigate the relationship between intralesional and systemic blood pressure. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective HIPAA-compliant study, patients referred for CT-guided sclerotherapy of cystic bone lesions or CT-guided bone marrow biopsy between November 2020 and February 2022 were consecutively enrolled. IOP was recorded in vivo through the biopsy needle using a closed arterial pressure monitoring system for 5 min. Demographic variables and systemic blood pressure were collected. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Student t test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between intraosseous and systemic blood pressure. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsSeven patients with cystic bone lesions (CBL) and 45 patients with normal marrow histology were included. Participants with CBL were younger than those in the normal marrow group (20 ± 4 vs 55 ± 14 years; p < 0.001) and had lower mean arterial pressure (80 ± 11 vs 93 ± 13 mmHg; p = 0.02). Systolic intraosseous pressures were significantly higher in cystic lesions (90 ± 18 mm Hg vs. 67 ± 23 mm Hg, p = 0.01). There was no significant correlation between systemic blood pressure and intraosseous pressure (all p > 0.35).
conclusionCystic bone lesions demonstrate elevated intraosseous pressures, particularly systolic parameters, compared with normal marrow. Intraosseous pressures appear independent of systemic blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42234093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.