ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Fatal Injuries Caused by Falling Trees: Correlation Between Postmortem Computed Tomography and Forensic Autopsy Findings in Eight Cases.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falling trees and large branches can result in severe blunt trauma; however, detailed correlations between postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and forensic autopsy findings in such deaths remain limited. We retrospectively analysed eight consecutive deaths occurring between 2012 and 2025 in which impact or compression by a tree trunk or large branch constituted the primary traumatic event and in which both PMCT and complete forensic autopsy were performed. Thin-slice PMCT of the head and trunk was obtained using standard brain, soft-tissue, lung, and bone windows, supplemented by a gas-optimised thoracic setting. Scene information, PMCT, and autopsy findings were integrated to determine the primary mechanism of death and to compare intracranial, thoracoabdominal, skeletal, and asphyxial injuries. Four lethal mechanisms were identified: instantly fatal head or brainstem injury (n = 2), haemorrhagic shock without cardiac rupture (n = 2), traumatic shock with cardiac rupture and/or aortic injury (n = 2), and asphyxia due to smothering or thoracic compression (n = 2). PMCT demonstrated complex fractures of the ribs, scapulae, spine, and pelvis, as well as haemothorax, haemoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and pre-existing coronary artery calcification, and suggested aortic injury in one case. However, brainstem lesions, precise sites of cardiac and aortic rupture, and low-contrast parenchymal injuries were identified only at autopsy. These results suggest that PMCT is valuable for delineating global injury patterns and high-energy marker lesions in falling-tree deaths, whereas full forensic autopsy remains essential for establishing the exact mechanism of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.