Trial reportLasers in medical science2026
Clinical and vaginal microbiota effects of oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 combined with vaginal laser therapy in menopausal women with atrophic vulvovaginitis: a prospective, randomized and controlled study.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaginal atrophy is a common condition in postmenopausal women, frequently associated with vaginal symptoms and alterations of the vaginal microbiota. This randomized study evaluated the clinical and microbiological effects of vaginal CO₂ laser therapy administered alone or in combination with an oral probiotic containing L. crispatus M247 in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy. Women were randomized (2:1) to receive vaginal laser therapy alone (laser-only group) or laser therapy plus oral probiotic for 90 days (probiotic plus laser group). Clinical efficacy was assessed through a prespecified panel of outcomes, including vaginal pH and symptom severity assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), at baseline and during follow-up up to 90 days, with Day 90 representing the main efficacy timepoint. Vaginal microbiota composition was analyzed in a subset of participants. Both groups showed improvement over time in vaginal pH and VAS scores for vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, burning, itching, and introital pain. Compared with laser alone, the probiotic plus laser group showed lower symptom scores at Day 90 in selected clinical domains, with effect estimates generally favoring the probiotic plus laser group, although confidence intervals were relatively wide for some endpoints. P-values for individual outcomes should be interpreted as nominal in the absence of prespecified multiplicity adjustment across clinical domains. For vaginal pH, both groups showed a decrease over time, but the group × time interaction was not statistically significant, indicating no clear differential temporal response. Microbiota analysis showed an increase in the relative abundance of L. crispatus and a concomitant decrease in L. iners only in the probiotic plus laser group, suggesting a shift toward a more favorable vaginal microbial profile. Overall, vaginal CO₂ laser therapy was associated with clinical improvement, and adjunctive treatment with L. crispatus M247 was associated with additional benefits across selected clinical and microbiological outcomes; however, confidence intervals for several clinical estimates were relatively wide, supporting cautious interpretation and confirmation in larger blinded studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.