SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Is there a role for early SSTR-targeting PRRT in GEP-NET?
Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, such as [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, is approved as a second-line treatment for progressive, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). However, emerging evidence suggests potential earlier roles for PRRT. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, including case reports, original papers, and clinical trial protocols evaluating neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or first-line PRRT in GEP-NETs. A systematic search of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov (up to May 31, 2025) finally identified 25 eligible papers. For each paper, data were extracted regarding clinical setting, patient characteristics, treatment regimen, and oncologic and surgical outcomes.
resultsThe available preliminary data, comprising case reports, retrospective and prospective cohorts, show that neoadjuvant PRRT can induce tumor shrinkage, regression of vascular involvement, and conversion from unresectable to resectable disease in up to 45% of patients. Reported outcomes include high objective response rates (up to 70%), improved surgical feasibility, and a promising survival benefit, especially in patients who received PRRT before surgery. Also, preliminary results from the NETTER-2 trial support the use of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE as first-line therapy in SSTR-positive G2-G3 GEP-NET, showing significant improvement in progression-free survival. Differently, the evidence for adjuvant use is missing.
conclusionCurrent data suggest that PRRT, traditionally approved as a later-line therapy, may play a promising role in neoadjuvant and first-line settings for selected GEP-NET patients, enhancing resectability, improving surgical outcomes, and potentially prolonging survival. Further prospective, randomized studies are needed to define selection criteria, determine optimal timing, and assess the long-term impact on disease trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42234009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.