Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233968›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2026

Dietary and Lifestyle Patterns among Young Patients with Lung Cancer: Analysis of Mutation-Specific Phenotypes.

Sarah D Gorbatov, Marisa A Bittoni, Anna H Wu, Allison Harper, Virginia Kotait, Narjust Florez, David P Carbone, Barbara Gitlitz, Jorge Nieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah D GorbatovCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California.ORCID 0009-0001-5637-4330
Marisa A BittoniThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-3294
Anna H WuKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-902X
Allison HarperAddario Lung Cancer Medical Institute , San Carlos, California.ORCID 0009-0004-2437-4047
Virginia KotaitAddario Lung Cancer Medical Institute , San Carlos, California.ORCID 0009-0002-6538-2874
Narjust FlorezDana-Farber Cancer Institute , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-1773
David P CarboneThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-1921
Barbara GitlitzKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0009-0001-0107-3135
Jorge NievaKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1605-4719

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
USC/CHLA Summer Oncology Research Fellowship (SORF) Program for Medical StudentsR25CA225513 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI ANAT ERDREICH-EPSTEIN, WIJBE MARTIN KAST · 2019 to 2026
$1.7M
Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation (ALCF) G02Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (DCP, NCI) P30CA014089National Cancer Institute (NCI) CA225513NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NCI NIH HHS R25 CA225513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer in young adults is biologically distinct, with 84% harboring targetable mutations largely unassociated with active and passive tobacco exposure. Environmental risk factors remain poorly characterized in this predominantly female, non-tobacco smoking population.

methodsWe analyzed 187 patients in the Epidemiology of Young Lung Cancer study using biological pathway groupings: EGFR Pathway (EGFR + ERBB2), Fusion-Positive (ALK + ROS1 + RET + NTRK), and Other/Mixed Mutations (KRAS, BRAF, MET exon 14 skipping, TP53, and additional alterations). Dietary quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 and compared with US reference values from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Statistical comparisons used one-sample t tests.

resultsActive and passive tobacco use diverged from traditional mutation associations. In the Other/Mixed Mutations group, 68.8% never used tobacco despite these mutations being linked to tobacco exposure. Conversely, the EGFR Pathway group included 32.9% with a history of tobacco use. Oral contraceptive use among females was consistently elevated (81.7%-90.2%). Dietary analysis revealed that EGFR Pathway and Fusion-Positive patients demonstrated higher HEI-2015 scores versus the US reference (64.9 ± 10.7 and 65.5 ± 9.8 vs. 58) and consumed more total vegetables (4.2 vs. 3.5), fruits (3.3 vs. 2.5), and whole grains (3.9 vs. 2.6).

conclusionsYoung patients with lung cancer demonstrated mutation-specific environmental exposure patterns distinct from older populations. EGFR Pathway and Fusion-Positive patients had the highest diet quality scores, driven primarily by higher intake of vegetables, fruits, and whole grains-food categories with established protective associations and documented pesticide residues. IMPACT: These findings highlight nontobacco environmental exposures in young patients with lung cancer and support further investigation of dietary patterns and hormonal factors in mutation-specific disease pathways.

Indexed as

DietLife StyleLung NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMutationPhenotypeRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42233968
PMCPMC13340576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.