ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2026
Leveraging Commercially Available Protein Assays as Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.
Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality, yet blood-based biomarkers are not routinely used in diagnosis. This study evaluated four commercial blood protein assays, originally validated for other indications, in indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN).
methodsUsing a prospective specimen collection, retrospective blinded evaluation design, samples were collected from patients with screening-detected, incidental, or symptomatic IPNs. Cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), and human epididymis protein 4 (HE-4) concentrations were quantified on commercial immunoassays. Logistic regression models were developed using internal training (Train), external testing (Test), and combined reestimation (Train + Test) cohorts and externally validated in an outcome-blinded multicenter cohort (Lung Team Project-2, LTP-2).
resultsThis study included 816 patients: 371 in Train, 166 in Test, and 279 in LTP-2. Malignancy rates were 54%, 44%, and 64%, respectively. In Train + Test, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for lung cancer was 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.65) for CYFRA 21-1, 0.62 (0.58-0.67) for CEA, 0.60 (0.55-0.65) for CA-125, and 0.65 (0.60-0.70) for HE-4. In LTP-2, AUCs were 0.63 (0.56-0.70), 0.64 (0.57-0.70), 0.48 (0.40-0.55), and 0.61 (0.54-0.68), respectively. Combining all four biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.70 (0.65-0.74) in Train + Test and 0.61 (0.54-0.68) in LTP-2.
conclusionsIn the first biomarker study reporting external validation in LTP-2, CYFRA 21-1, CEA, CA-125, and HE-4 demonstrated diagnostic value in IPNs. IMPACT: By leveraging commercial assays, this study highlights opportunities to enhance lung cancer risk stratification using widely available diagnostics that could be rapidly integrated into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.