ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Evaluation of the immunological profile of older adults according to Brazilian regions: results of ELSI-Brazil].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunosenescence refers to the changes in the immune system with aging, including the increase in inflammatory biomarkers, a phenomenon known as Inflammaging, which is related to the emergence of diseases associated with aging. This study aimed to describe the distribution of immunological biomarkers in the five Brazilian regions and to estimate the predicted probabilities of their concentrations in the tertiles of distribution, according to geographic regions. Serological samples from 2,111 participants (≥ 50 years) collected at the baseline (2015/2016) of ELSI-Brazil were analyzed. The geographic regions (North, Northeast, Central-West, Southeast, and South) were the exposure of interest for the study, and potential confounding factors included age, sex, educational level, area of residence, alcohol and tobacco consumption, physical activity, and self-reported medical diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes, asthma, arthritis, and cancer. The predicted probabilities of biomarker concentrations in each tertile were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models, adjusted for confounders. Notably, the North and Northeast regions had higher serum levels, while the Central-West Region had lower levels, suggesting differences in immunobiography, which may be the result of different environmental, socioeconomic, and infectious exposures throughout life. However, the reasons for these differences have not yet been elucidated and need to be investigated in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.