ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026
Research Review: Emotion regulation in individuals with intellectual disability - an integrative review.
Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcross diverse populations, there is growing evidence that emotion regulation is central to healthy adaptation. Much is known about emotion regulation processes in typically developing populations, but comparatively very little is known about how these processes unfold in individuals with intellectual disability.
methodsThis integrative review advances understanding of emotion regulation in intellectual disability within a clinical framework. We first synthesize research on affective and behavioral functioning across the heterogeneous intellectual disability population. We then apply the process model of emotion regulation to examine how differences in cognition, language, and executive functioning shape regulation capacities. Particular attention is given to the distinction between self-focused strategies used by individuals to regulate their own emotions, and other-focused, interpersonal strategies (i.e. caregiver-mediated support), which may play a particularly critical role for individuals with intellectual disability across the lifespan. Finally, we discuss implications for clinical practice, including interventions for promoting healthy emotion regulation in intellectual disability within the process model framework and recommendations for family-centered approaches.
conclusionsBy integrating empirical evidence with a widely used theoretical model, this review establishes a foundation for conceptualizing emotion regulation in intellectual disability and for improving interventions that support emotional well-being in this underserved population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.