ArticlemSystems2026
Expanding vaginal microbiome pangenomes via a custom MIDAS database reveals
Article in mSystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vaginal microbiome plays a central role in reproductive health. Vaginal microbiome dysbiosis is associated with many adverse reproductive health outcomes, but most studies have focused on associations at the species level. The potential contribution of intraspecies microbial variation, especially gene content differences across bacterial strains, remains underexplored in reproductive health contexts. The Metagenomic Intra-Species Diversity Analysis (MIDAS) framework enables such analyses, but depends on comprehensive reference databases. We constructed a MIDAS-compatible pangenome database from over 18,000 genomes in the Vaginal Microbiome Genome Collection (VMGC). Compared to the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB)-derived reference, the VMGC-derived database expanded the pangenomes of prevalent vaginal species, better capturing vaginal-specific intraspecies diversity. Applying this database to vaginal samples from a cervical dysplasia cohort, we identified 13
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.