ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
A Data-Driven Normalization Framework for Subject-Specific Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment in Cerebrovascular Disease.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial for "A Data-Driven Normalization Framework for Subject-Specific Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment in Cerebrovascular Disease".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssessment of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) has been reported using acetazolamide-augmented blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI; however, wide intersubject baseline variability can complicate interpretation. PURPOSE: To develop an integrated normalization framework combining machine learning-guided identification of healthy voxels for subject-specific baseline rescaling with atlas-based assessment. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: 26 subjects (age 51 ± 13 at first scan, 50% women, 34 exams) with unilateral steno-occlusive disease (SOD) and 9 subjects with bilateral disease (age 55 ± 12, 4/9 women) underwent acetazolamide-augmented BOLD-MRI. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1-weighted MPRAGE (1 mm isotropic) and gradient-echo EPI at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Machine learning models (random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and neural networks) were trained to identify healthy candidate voxels using a previously reported pipeline based on baseline resting-state BOLD temporal shift features derived from 32 arterial territories. A healthy reference CVR atlas was constructed from unaffected hemispheres. Individual CVR maps were rescaled using predicted healthy voxels and converted to Z-scores and risk index maps using the reference atlas. STATISTICAL TESTS: Coefficient of variation (CV) within normal hemispheres, lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), Lesion ROC AUC, asymmetry index (AI) in unilateral patients, and chi-square distance between thresholded normal and abnormal CVR distributions across all patients were compared between atlas-based group normalization alone and the proposed integrated normalization using paired t-tests. (cutoff p = 0.05).
resultsCV within normal hemispheres significantly decreased (1.07 ± 0.15 vs. 0.45 ± 0.09), indicating improved inter-subject stability. Lesion CNR and ROC AUC improved across all impairment thresholds (CNR: 0.73-1.12 vs. 0.79-1.19; AUC: 0.76-0.89 vs. 0.81-0.90). AI increased significantly at higher risk thresholds (≥ 0.78), with no significant difference at the lowest threshold (p = 0.181). Chi-square analysis demonstrated significantly increased separation between CVR distributions at intermediate thresholds. DATA
conclusionThe proposed integrated normalization improves the stability, discriminability, and interpretability of acetazolamide-augmented BOLD-CVR for detection of cerebrovascular impairment. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.