Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233496›Full record

ReviewPlant, cell & environment2026

Physiology and Genetics of Continuous Flowering in Plants.

Zhuping Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant, cell & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhuping FanCollege of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3069-6726

Funding

Basic Research Programme of Jiangsu Province BK20250691Major Basic Research Project of the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions 25KJB220008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous flowering, a key adaptive trait in perennial plants, confers significant ornamental and breeding value. Here, we review the developmental patterns, transcriptional and epigenetic regulation underlying continuous flowering. Key genetic loci, including SFL, PFRU, and RB, are discussed. At the transcriptional level, continuous flowering is closely associated with loss-of-function mutations in KSN (including frameshifts, transposon insertions, large deletions, and SNP). In roses, epigenetic modifications such as promoter hypermethylation fine-tune KSN expression via a transcriptional dosage mechanism. Given that continuous flowering plants often exhibit distinct life cycles and branching architectures from once-flowering plants, we hypothesise the existence of a regulatory pathway linking branching development to continuous flowering. Future studies should explore epigenetic and post-translational regulation, flowering capacity-quality trade-offs, and cross-species comparisons to advance molecular breeding.

Indexed as

FlowersEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant ProteinsPlant Proteinscontinuous floweringKSNPFRUSFLTFL1

Identifiers

PMID42233496
PMCPMC13436547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.