ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026
Happiness Measured by a Single Item: Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Version of Fordyce Global Happiness Scale Among University Students and Mothers of Children With Intellectual Disabilities.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAiming to validate the Fordyce Global Happiness Scale in Arabic, this cross-sectional study recruited two convenience Saudi samples of 422 university students and 85 mothers of children with intellectual disabilities.
methodsAmong students, a latent variable model was used to examine scale convergent/divergent validity relative to life satisfaction and depressive symptomatology. Scale cutoffs were assessed in the two samples through cluster analyses and ROC analysis. Differences in happiness were evaluated between mothers and students and across student groups of gender, academic degree, and type of study (practical vs. theoretical).
resultsThe latent variable model expressed good fit, showing satisfaction with life and positive affect as significant positive predictors of happiness, which was inversely associated with somatic complaints and negative affect. Two-step cluster analysis resulted in a two-cluster solution, which revealed three cutoffs (among students: < 5, 5-8, > 8 and among mothers: < 4, 4-8, > 8), which significantly classified the samples according to the levels of happiness into low/mild, moderate, and high. ROC analysis revealed an optimal cutoff of 4.5 with high sensitivity (100%) and acceptable specificity (74% and 62%) among students and mothers, respectively. The highest and lowest levels of all depressive symptoms were noticed in participants with happiness scores (< 4.5 or < 5) and > 8, respectively. Known-group validity was signaled by lower overall happiness scores in the mother sample relative to university students.
conclusionsFordyce Global Happiness Scale captures happiness as a distinct construct, which relates to the cognitive and emotional components of well-being and physical symptoms of psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.