Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233268›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Psychological Distress, Caregiver Burden and Quality of Life Among Informal Carers of First Nations Australians Diagnosed With Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Idin Panahi, Helena Romaniuk, Shafkat Jahan, Kenneth Carter, Jacinta Elston, Gail Garvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Idin PanahiFirst Nations Cancer & Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0629-1497
Helena RomaniukFirst Nations Cancer & Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5801-2077
Shafkat JahanFirst Nations Cancer & Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0447-8664
Kenneth CarterFirst Nations Cancer & Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-1056-4347
Jacinta ElstonFirst Nations Cancer & Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gail GarveyFirst Nations Cancer & Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5065-5716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionInformal carers provide essential support for people diagnosed with cancer, however, the demands of caregiving can negatively impact their psychological wellbeing. There is a need to examine psychological wellbeing among carers of First Nations cancer patients to understand the impacts of caregiving within cultural contexts. Therefore, this study aims to quantify carer psychological distress, burden, and quality of life (QoL) among carers of First Nations Australian cancer patients - key indicators of carer wellbeing that may have implications for both carers and patients.MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study recruited adult (≥18 years) carers of First Nations Australians diagnosed with cancer across six Queensland hospitals (July 2021-December 2024). Of 221 eligible carers, 172 (78%) participated in the study. Logistic regression models assessed association between carer characteristics with high psychological distress (Distress Thermometer, score≥4) and significant carer burden (six-item Zarit Burden Interview, score≥6); linear models assessed associations with QoL (CarerQoL-7D).Results165 (96%) carers approached were included in the analysis, of which 67% (n=111) identified as First Nations. High distress was reported by 43% (95% CI:36%-51%), 44% reported significant carer burden (95%CI:37%-52%), and mean CarerQoL-7D score was 9.7 (95%CI:9.3-10.1). Only prevalence of high distress differed between First Nations and non-Indigenous carers. For all carers as well as First Nations carers, clinical diagnosis of anxiety and/or depression was associated with high distress, significant carer burden and lower QoL.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this study is the first to quantify the psychological wellbeing of carers of First Nations cancer patients in Australia. We observed no associations typically expected for wellbeing and distress among carers, except for with clinical anxiety/depression, suggesting that existing measures may not fully capture carer's experiences in this population. These findings highlight the need for culturally appropriate measures co-designed with Indigenous communities to better assess and support carer wellbeing.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsPsychological DistressQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalAdultAgedAustralasian PeopleCost of IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQueenslandcaregiver burdeninformal carer of First Nations cancer patientspsychological distressquality of life (QoL)

Identifiers

PMID42233268
PMCPMC13237455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.