Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233189›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2026

Tobacco Industry Contributions to the Development of Ultraprocessed Food in the United States, 1985-2007: A Case Study of Lunchables.

Laura A Schmidt

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laura A SchmidtLaura A. Schmidt is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco.ORCID 0000-0003-4346-7260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We need to know how ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) are designed and formulated to better understand why these products cause overeating and weight gain, and how to apply appropriate guardrails. This information, however, is typically kept hidden by UPF companies as proprietary trade secrets. Using previously undisclosed internal company documents, this study traced product development for Lunchables, a prepackaged meal brand developed at Kraft General Foods while it was owned by the tobacco giant Philip Morris Companies. Findings show that a key reason Philip Morris purchased food companies was to increase revenues by sharing proprietary research and development assets across tobacco and food product lines. Philip Morris applied its product development approach for making cigarettes to Lunchables in 2 important ways: First, it applied its "consumer-driven product development" strategy that optimized products for consumer pleasure and appeal. Second, Phillip Morris applied its "better-for-you" reformulation strategy, first used to create filtered Marlboro cigarettes, to develop Low-Fat Lunchables in efforts to keep consumers worried about childhood obesity loyal to the brand. These findings speak to the need for public health research and policies that extend existing models for regulating tobacco to UPFs. (

Indexed as

Tobacco IndustryFood, ProcessedHistory, 20th CenturyHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42233189
PMCPMC13277455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.