Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233134›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of palliative care

Palliative Care Social Work Standards of Practice - Review of Select International Protocols.

Gunavathy J S, Joby M P

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gunavathy J SDepartment of Social Work, Madras School of Social Work, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Joby M PDepartment of Social Work, Madras School of Social Work, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exigent and interpretive nature of palliative care social work (PCSW) emphasises the need for a palliative care social workers (PCSWers) practice protocol, also known as standards of practice for palliative care social workers (PCSWers). However, till date, there are no agreed-upon standards of practice for PCSWs in India. In this backdrop, the purposes of this paper are (a) to review the widely available PCSW standards of practice, (b) to juxtapose the commonalities and the distinct features of the same and (c) to put forth suggestions that could be imbibed in the Indian context. This paper is based on a thematic review of select prominent social work standards of practice in PC in the American, Australian, and British contexts. Among other findings, the common standards of practice spelt out by the three protocols are ethics and values, knowledge, professionalism and setting specific skills. While the American and Australian templates mention about being culturally aware and responsive, the British template mentions context and organisations. Each of the documents mentions a range of skills required for effective practice, such as assessment, intervention planning, communication and interpersonal skills and documentation skills. Based on the findings, suggestions for a standard of practice of PCSW in the Indian context are put forth. To sum up, the paper provides a thematic analysis of three international standards of practice for PCSW. The findings provide insights for the development of a similar standard in India.

Indexed as

AustraliaPalliative care social workStandards of practiceUKUS

Identifiers

PMID42233134
PMCPMC13224290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.