Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233128›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of palliative care

Interventional Nerve Procedures for Pain Related to Head-and-Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Alexandre Yamada Fujimura Júnior, Dayse Mirian Nunes Araujo, Jairo Pinheiro da Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandre Yamada Fujimura JúniorDepartment of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de Marília, Marília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0839-8272
Dayse Mirian Nunes AraujoDepartment of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de Marília, Marília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2523-327X
Jairo Pinheiro da SilvaDepartment of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de Marília, Marília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-8525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To systematically review the evidence on the use of peripheral nerve interventions, including anaesthetic blocks, neurolysis and radiofrequency techniques, for the management of cancer-related pain in patients with head-and-neck malignancies. The review aimed to assess their clinical efficacy, access routes, safety profiles and associated complications. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024564969) and conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library through July 2024. Included studies evaluated peripheral nerve interventions in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients reporting at least one predefined outcome. Data on pain relief, duration of effect, medication use and adverse events were extracted. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools and ROB 2, depending on study design. Twenty-eight studies involving 536 patients were included. Of these, 298 received anaesthetic nerve blocks, 74 underwent neurolytic procedures, and 164 were treated with radiofrequency-based interventions. Sphenopalatine ganglion block and glossopharyngeal nerve block were the most frequently reported anaesthetic techniques, both demonstrating good efficacy and favourable safety profiles. Neurolytic procedures targeting superficial nerves (e.g., sphenopalatine, occipital, auriculotemporal) were generally effective and well tolerated. Neurolysis of the glossopharyngeal nerve showed promising results but was associated with greater anatomical risk and limited safety data. Pulsed and thermal radiofrequency (PRF/TRF) targeting the glossopharyngeal and trigeminal nerves were effective, with PRF showing a better safety profile. TRF was associated with transient dysphagia, sensory changes and reduced gag reflex. No major complications were reported across studies. However, outcomes and techniques varied widely, and most studies were case reports or small case series, often with a high ROB. Peripheral nerve interventions, particularly sphenopalatine and glossopharyngeal blocks, may be effective and safe options for pain management in HNC patients. Larger, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings and support broader clinical use.

Indexed as

Head-and-neck neoplasmsNeurolysisPain managementPalliative careRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID42233128
PMCPMC13224304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.