Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Acute effects of a single recess physical activity session on sustained attention among junior high school students: a randomized controlled trial based on in-class task performance.

Ximing Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ximing XiaoSchool of Marxism, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This randomized controlled trial explored the acute effects of a single recess physical activity session on junior high school students' sustained attention, examined the chain mediating roles of executive function and academic engagement, and aimed to inform optimal recess arrangements. Methods: A total of 168 junior high school students from two public schools, stratified by grade and sex, were randomly assigned to an experimental group (20 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during recess) or a control group (sedentary recess). Sustained attention was assessed at baseline and post-intervention using the d2 Test. Post-intervention measures included executive functioning (BRIEF-SR) and academic engagement (behavioral observations). Data were analyzed using a mixed-design ANOVA to assess the time and condition effects. Chain mediation was examined using the PROCESS macro (Model 6, 10,000 bootstrap samples) and structural equation modeling with maximum likelihood estimation. Results: Demographic analyses indicated higher physical activity intensity in males and better executive functioning in ninth graders, with no group differences in academic engagement or sustained attention at baseline. Mixed-design ANOVA revealed significant group × time interactions for sustained attention [F(1,166) = 18.42, Conclusion: A single moderate-to-vigorous physical activity session during recess acutely enhances junior high school students' sustained attention, mediated sequentially by executive functioning and academic engagement. However, the simultaneous measurement of mediators suggests that these findings should be replicated using longitudinal designs featuring temporally separated assessments.

Indexed as

academic engagementchain mediationexecutive functionjunior high school studentsrandomized controlled trialrecess physical activitysustained attention

Identifiers

PMID42233071
PMCPMC13225767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.