ArticleMethodsX2026
Transforming financial documents into credit decisions using explainable artificial intelligence and optical character recognition.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing use of digital technology in banking and financial services has accelerated the adoption of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in lending and credit scoring. While advanced ensemble models offer higher predictive accuracy than traditional statistical approaches, they are often difficult to interpret. This lack of transparency raises concerns related to fairness, regulatory compliance, and borrower trust. This study proposes an integrated Explainable Artificial Intelligence framework for automated credit scoring and lending decisions. The framework utilizes Optical Character Recognition through EasyOCR, PyPDF2, and PdfPlumber to extract financial and identity data from applicant documents, followed by data cleaning, normalization, and structured feature engineering. SHAP and LIME are applied to generate global and local explanations, enhancing interpretability. Experimental evaluation shows that XGBoost achieves 92.5% accuracy, outperforming LightGBM (90.8%), Random Forest (87%), Logistic Regression (91%), and LSTM (81%).•The methodology integrates document-based data extraction with supervised learning models to generate accurate credit scores and lending decisions.•Performance metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, MAE, RMSE, and R² confirm the superior performance of XGBoost in credit risk prediction.•The results highlight that combining structured financial features with explainable models improves transparency, supports regulatory compliance, and enhances decision-making reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.