ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Influence of Mask-Wearing Attitudes on Compliance with Removable Orthodontic Devices: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the impact of mask-wearing on orthodontic patient compliance and to identify factors associated with adherence. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 214 orthodontic patients (64.0% female; predominantly aged 19-30 years) who had used removable orthodontic devices. Data on demographics, treatment duration, appliance type, mask-wearing attitudes and wear times were collected. Key variables included mask-wearing attitudes, which were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree"), actual and recommended wear times of appliances, overall compliance (actual/recommended wear time), and daytime compliance proportion (actual daytime/total wear time). Results: Although 52.2% of participants agreed that masks facilitated acceptance of unaesthetic appliances, this perception was associated with lower daytime ( Conclusion: Most orthodontic patients believe that wearing a mask helps them accept less attractive appliances, but this belief did not lead to better treatment compliance. Those with neutral attitudes wore appliances more during the day. Daytime wear strongly predicts overall compliance. For clinicians, this means that patients who count on masks to hide their appliances may need extra attention. Rather than focusing only on reducing aesthetic concerns, efforts should also focus on helping patients build consistent daytime wear habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.