ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Association between
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in children is characterized by impaired skin barrier function, type 2 inflammation, and frequent Objective: To assess dupilumab efficacy in children with moderate-to-severe AD unresponsive to conventional therapy and to describe skin and nasal microbial colonization patterns at the 12-month time point compared with moderate AD receiving conventional topical therapy and healthy controls. Methods: Prospective observational study. Children aged 6-16 years were enrolled in three groups: (a) moderate-to-severe AD starting dupilumab (assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months); (b) moderate AD receiving conventional topical therapy not eligible for biologic therapy; and (c) age-matched healthy controls. Outcomes included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (C-DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). At 12 months, nasal and skin e-Swabs were cultured; isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using the Friedman test ( Results: Ten dupilumab-treated children (mean age 13 years; 60% males) showed rapid and sustained improvement in C-DLQI (median 13.5 to 3 at 3 months; 3.5 at 12 months), EASI (24.5 to 5.65 at 3 months, 1.2 at 12 months), and pruritus (NRS 10 to 4.5 at 3 months; 5.5 at 12 months). No adverse events or discontinuations occurred. At 12 months, nasal Conclusion: Dupilumab provides sustained clinical benefit and, in this cross-sectional assessment of a small pilot cohort, is associated with lower
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.