ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Recording of wider determinants of health in UK primary care using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) databases, a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To explore the recording of wider determinants of health in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Gold and CPRD Aurum primary care databases (jointly CPRD Combined), and, presented these for description in relation to the UK Census 2011 and UK Census 2021. Wider determinants explored include country of birth, language, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, care home residence, unpaid carer responsibilities, and relationship status. Methods: All acceptable, currently registered patients from the CPRD databases on the relevant UK Census dates were included. The proportion of patients with a record pertaining to each wider determinant of health was assessed. The distribution of each characteristic in the CPRD populations was descriptively presented against the distribution of that characteristic in the UK Census populations. Results: There were 17,232,402 and 16,935,144 acceptable, currently registered patients in CPRD Combined at the time of the 2011 and 2021-2 UK Censuses, respectively. The proportion of CPRD Combined patients in 2021-2 with any codes related to country of birth was 3.65%, to language was 42.92%, to religion was 7.05%, to sexual orientation was 1.46%, to gender identity was 0.11%, to care home residence was 0.43%, to unpaid carer responsibilities was 1.35%, and to legal partnership status was 25.39%. Recording increased between the Censuses. Recording was lower in CPRD Gold compared to CPRD Aurum. Conclusions: Recording of the wider determinants of health examined in this study was low in primary care across the board. Despite limitations, researchers still use CPRD data to investigate questions on the wider determinants of health because of the sparsity of alternative real world data sources that include the richness of health-related data available in CPRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.