ArticleFrontiers in allergy2026
Microcrystalline tyrosine as a novel depot-forming agent in venom immunotherapy: a pre-clinical evaluation in bee-venom allergic mice.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) with aqueous venom extracts is a standard treatment for severe insect venom allergies. In other fields of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), depot adjuvants have been used for decades, with benefits for both safety and efficacy. Biodegradable microcrystalline tyrosine (MCT), is well-established in AIT, and has proven both safe and effective through sustained release and adjuvancy. The objective of the current study was to evaluate MCT as a depot-forming agent in VIT using a murine model of bee venom allergy. Materials and methods: Mice were sensitised with bee venom extract and then received subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with 10, 50, or 100 µg aqueous venom extracts or venom formulated with MCT or aluminium hydroxide (alum) as depot-forming agents. Systemic reactions upon VIT and challenge were assessed by measuring body temperature, while antigen-specific IgE and IgG responses were analysed by ELISA. Mast cell degranulation was evaluated by serum MCPT-1 levels. Results: VIT with MCT significantly improved survival, reduced body temperature changes, and promoted robust IgG1 and IgG2b responses. While antibody responses were comparable between MCT and alum at higher VIT doses (50 and 100 µg), MCT also induced significant IgG responses at lower doses (10 µg), indicating enhanced sensitivity of the immune response to MCT. MCT-treated mice further exhibited reduced mast-cell degranulation compared to untreated controls, consistent with a reduced risk of anaphylaxis. Conclusion: VIT with bee venom extract and MCT enabled safe and effective VIT by promoting protective IgG responses and reducing systemic reactions. These findings further support the evaluation of MCT as a complement to aqueous allergen extracts in VIT for human use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.