ArticleGastro hep advances2026
From Pilot to Practice: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Gastroenterology E-Consultations at an Academic Medical Center.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Electronic consultations (e-consults) are asynchronous, provider-to-provider exchanges that allow specialists to provide clinical guidance without an in-person visit. Referring clinicians submit focused questions through the electronic health record, and specialists review relevant history and data to make recommendations. At many academic centers, waits for specialty appointments exceed months, limiting timely care and underscoring the need for alternative referral pathways. We evaluated the implementation, utilization, and provider experiences of a gastroenterology e-consult program at Massachusetts General Hospital. Methods: We analyzed all gastroenterology e-consults from January 2023 through September 2024, extracting completion rates, turnaround times, and clinical indications from 2416 encounters. Anonymous 5-point Likert surveys assessed satisfaction, perceived utility, and implementation barriers among referring providers and consulting gastroenterologists. Results: Of 2416 e-consults involving 2038 unique patients, 2112 (87%) were completed, with a mean turnaround time of 2.6 business days. Hepatology and abnormal imaging findings comprised nearly half of all requests. Referring providers reported high satisfaction and educational value, with most indicating that e-consults reduced unnecessary visits and testing. Consultants recognized clinical utility but cited inadequate reimbursement and difficulty meeting turnaround targets. Conclusion: Gastroenterology e-consults can operate effectively at scale, particularly for objective, data-driven questions such as abnormal liver function tests and imaging findings. However, the satisfaction gap between referring providers and consultants, driven largely by reimbursement and workload pressures, threatens long-term sustainability. Addressing these challenges through payment models that reflect cognitive work and streamlined workflows will be essential to maintain specialist engagement while expanding access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.