ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Office Hysteroscopy: Treating Intrauterine Pathology and Avoiding the Operating Room.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Office hysteroscopy is a versatile minimally invasive procedure. However, there are limited data reporting long-term follow-up of patients undergoing these procedures. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of additional procedures performed in 1 and 3 years following office hysteroscopy, and to evaluate how frequently full assessment of the uterine cavity could be performed. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all office hysteroscopies that were performed between July 2015 and December 2021. Chart review was performed to extract patient demographic data, medical history, office hysteroscopy procedural data, pathology results, and any subsequent gynecological surgery. Results: Only 13% of patients required further gynecologic intervention in the operating room (OR) within 1 year and 16% required further intervention in the OR within 3 years. A total of 82.7% of polyps and 90% of retained foreign bodies, were successfully removed in the office. A total of 93.4% had an adequate diagnostic office hysteroscopy with full evaluation of intrauterine cavity. Conclusion: This study supports that office hysteroscopy is an effective approach that helps patients avoid the OR with the ability to perform an excellent diagnostic procedure and to treat common pathology. While patients with more advanced pathology may end up in the OR, office hysteroscopy can aid in planning the appropriate approach and procedure to be performed for more complex cases. Most our patients did not need an OR procedure in the 3 years following office hysteroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.