Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232858›Full record

ArticleChemical science2026

Automatic identification of compounds in molecular mixtures from liquid-phase infrared spectra.

Yannah J U Melle, Thanh Nguyen, Jeffrey Lopez, Daniel Schwalbe-Koda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yannah J U MelleDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Los Angeles CA USA dskoda@ucla.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0983-5544
Thanh NguyenDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University Evanston IL USA jlopez@northwestern.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7377-8053
Jeffrey LopezDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University Evanston IL USA jlopez@northwestern.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-5550
Daniel Schwalbe-KodaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Los Angeles CA USA dskoda@ucla.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-0854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpreting spectroscopy data is a critical bottleneck in automating chemical research and industrial characterization. Particularly within infrared (IR) spectroscopy, identifying compounds in complex, liquid-phase chemical mixtures largely relies on expert knowledge, as variable peak assignment, broadening, and shifts hinder data-driven methods. Here, we show that an algorithmic approach can identify components in both simulated and experimental mixture spectra with high accuracy despite nonlinearities in liquid-phase IR data. The method is comprehensively benchmarked with a dataset of over 44 000 simulated liquid-phase IR spectra for mixtures and achieves up to 90% accuracy in identifying molecular components across a dataset of binary and ternary liquid mixtures. Our strategy is robust to perturbation of spectra, and its accuracy is capped by near-identical liquid-phase IR spectra that limit the resolution of chemical identification, imposing theoretical limits on achieving perfect accuracy in structure identification. Finally, we apply the method to automatically interpret IR spectra in experimental settings, correctly identifying the components of nearly all samples within a blind study. This work provides tools and data to advance automated chemical laboratories through algorithmic interpretation of liquid-phase IR spectra of mixtures.

Identifiers

PMID42232858
PMCPMC13224293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.