ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026
Cost of adapting the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development, Guatemala and India.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cost of adapting the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development, Guatemala and India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To assess the cost of co-creating an adaptation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development (intervention for use by community health workers (CHWs)) in rural Guatemala and India. Methods: We developed survey instruments to capture the costs, from health-system and societal perspectives, of adapting the guide with local partners and international experts in the two sites. We included the costs of human resources, information technology, and infrastructure and logistic support. To improve the transparency and comparability of cost estimates, we reported the required resources for adaptation, such as time and expertise of human resources, and the quantity, function and usage time of the resources used. Findings: Adaptation of the guide took 14 months in India and 18 months in Guatemala during 2021-2022. Total costs by site were 38 174.57 United States dollars (US$) in Guatemala, US$ 39 287.15 in India and US$ 81 846.59 for international consultants. International consultants accounted for about half of the costs, and the Guatemala and India sites each accounted for about a quarter of the costs. Human resources were the largest contributor to the adaptation costs in both sites (90.1%; 34 398.20/38 174.57 in Guatemala and 94.8%; 37 262.74/39 287.15 in India) followed by infrastructure support and information technology. Conclusion: Since most of the required steps to adapt the guide for use by CHWs have now been done by our study, we expect future adaptation costs to be lower. The methods used in this study provide an example of how to cost intervention adaptations in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.