ArticleFrontiers in tuberculosis2026
Dose optimization of inhaled tigecycline in humans to overcome inherent adverse events and maximize bacterial clearance using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach.
Article in Frontiers in tuberculosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of biofilm formation on the antimicrobial activity of tigecycline againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Intrapulmonary delivery of tigecycline has been highlighted as an optimal strategy for enhancing local drug concentrations at the site of infection in the treatment of Methods: The PBPK model developed to predict plasma and target-site exposure of inhaled tigecycline and to relate these exposures to adverse event thresholds was derived from plasma and tissue concentration-time courses of Results: Using model-based simulations, we predicted the longitudinal exposure profiles of tigecycline in the systemic circulation, the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in the lungs as site of antibacterial activity, and other major organs following inhalation under clinically relevant conditions. Intrapulmonary aerosol dosing using the currently approved intravenous dose of tigecycline was predicted to result in significantly lower plasma exposure compared to the gastrointestinal adverse event threshold reported in the literature (AUC Discussion: Our findings indicate that compared to conventional intravenous infusion, inhaled tigecycline offers an improved safety margin and enhances bacterial killing. Based on simulations for multiple dosing scenarios in humans, a dose of 135 mg given every third day by intrapulmonary delivery would result in ELF, bone and plasma exposures that effectively balance efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.