ReviewBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Quantitative HER2 Scoring and Spatial Bystander Effect Modeling for ADC Response Stratification in HER2-Low Breast Cancer.
Review in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), particularly trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), has renewed interest in more refined assessment of low-end HER2 expression in breast cancer. However, substantial inter-observer variability in manual immunohistochemistry, especially around the IHC 0 versus 1+ boundary, remains a major challenge for consistent patient stratification. In this narrative review, we summarize emerging advances in computational pathology, including weakly supervised whole-slide image modeling and quantitative HER2 scoring approaches, and discuss their potential to improve interpretive consistency in this threshold-adjacent setting. We further examine the spatial rationale of the ADC bystander effect as a conceptual basis for integrating quantitative HER2 burden, heterogeneity, and spatial organization into response assessment. Rather than presenting these approaches as clinically established predictive tools, we argue that they should currently be viewed as exploratory and hypothesis-generating frameworks that warrant rigorous validation in outcome-linked, cross-platform, and multi-center studies. Overall, AI-assisted quantitative and spatial pathology may help refine biomarker development for ADC therapy in HER2-low breast cancer, but its clinical utility remains to be established through prospective and analytically robust validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.