Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232714›Full record

ReviewJournal of visualized surgery2024

Mastering the maze: navigating prolonged air leak in thoracic surgery.

Clarissa Uslenghi, Luca Bertolaccini, Monica Casiraghi, Matteo Chiari, Antonio Mazzella, Lorenzo Spaggiari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of visualized surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clarissa UslenghiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Luca BertolacciniDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Monica CasiraghiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Matteo ChiariDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Antonio MazzellaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo SpaggiariDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite technological advancements, prolonged air leak (PAL) remains a significant complication in thoracic surgery. PAL, indicative of an alveolar-pleural fistula (APF), impacts patient recovery, quality of life, and healthcare costs. Risk factors such as smoking and surgical techniques predispose patients to PAL, highlighting the importance of preoperative risk assessment. Segmentectomies, while beneficial for early-stage lung neoplasms, pose challenges due to increased PAL risk. Intraoperative techniques like the submersion test aid in PAL detection and categorisation. Standardising intraoperative management through initiatives like the Delphi consensus enhances PAL management. Studies on aerostatic interventions show promise in reducing PAL incidence. Postoperatively, chest drainage strategies play a crucial role, with digital chest drains offering improved monitoring and management precision. Long-term PAL management includes watchful waiting, chemical pleurodesis, and surgical interventions, with autologous blood patching emerging as a cost-effective intervention. Despite the array of interventions available, the lack of standardised guidelines underscores the multifactorial nature of PAL. In the context of visualised thoracic surgery, PAL remains a significant concern, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Visualised thoracic surgery, which encompasses minimally invasive techniques such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), offers several advantages, including reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. However, despite these benefits, PAL remains a common complication, particularly in procedures involving lung resection or pleural interventions. Advanced visualisation technology in thoracic surgery allows for precise identification and management of PAL intraoperatively. Techniques such as intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging enable real-time visualisation of air leaks, facilitating prompt intervention and potentially reducing the risk of PAL development. Additionally, adopting enhanced recovery protocols tailored to visualised thoracic surgery may help mitigate PAL risk by optimising perioperative care and promoting early mobilisation. Addressing PAL requires a comprehensive, individualised approach and continued research efforts in thoracic surgery. This review provides an overview of the challenges and strategies in navigating PAL, particularly on APF, emphasising the need for collaborative efforts and tailored approaches to optimise patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Indexed as

digital chest drainsintraoperative managementLung cancerprolonged air leak (PAL)risk factors

Identifiers

PMID42232714
PMCPMC13225053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.