Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232708›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2024

Uniportal & biportal robotic anatomic lung resection (without CO

Gregor J Kocher, Svea Wegener, Sarah Deckarm, Dominik V Flury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gregor J Kocher *Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Claraspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Svea Wegener *University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sarah DeckarmDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hirslanden Clinic Beau-Site (Hirslanden Group) & Lindenhof Hospital (Lindenhof Group Bern), Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik V FluryDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St. Claraspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While first applied in thoracic surgery two decades ago, different studies over the past 10 years confirmed the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). While initially performed with a multiportal approach (mRATS), the technological advancement now allows a uniportal technique for anatomic lung resections without the use of carbon dioxide (CO Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of the first 13 patients who underwent uniportal RATS (uRATS) or biportal RATS (bRATS) for anatomic lung resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery St. Claraspital Basel and Hirslanden Clinic Beau-Site & Lindenhof Bern in 2023 using the da Vinci Xi platform. Analyzed data included approach, resected segment or lobe, duration of surgery, blood loss, conversion, number of lymph nodes resected, histology, tumor stage, postoperative complications, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay (LOS) and costs. Results: In total, 13 patients underwent robotic-assisted anatomic lung resection. For five patients (38.46%) a uniportal approach was used and for eight patients (61.54%) a bRATS approach was used (with robotic stapling). We report no intraoperative complications with zero conversions to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy. uRATS and bRATS showed no significant difference in perioperative blood loss (uRATS mean: 46.40±45.11 mL, bRATS mean: 16.25±12.75 mL) (P=0.09), duration of operation (uRATS mean: 142.40±49.50 min, bRATS mean: 132.63±38.27 min) (P=0.69) and number of lymph nodes resected (uRATS mean: 11.00±5.57, bRATS mean: 18.14±15.02) (P=0.45). Patients who underwent surgery with a uniportal approach showed similar postoperative chest tube duration (uRATS mean: 3.40±1.52 days) compared to a bRATS approach (bRATS mean: 3.88±3.60 days) (P=0.78). Additionally, LOS was comparable between the groups (uRATS mean discharge after 4.00±1.22 days and bRATS mean discharge after 5.00±2.33 days) (P=0.33). One patient developed a prolonged postoperative air leak, managed conservatively in an outpatient setting. When comparing the cost of uRATS and bRATS to conventional uniportal VATS anatomic lung resections, robotic surgery was costlier resulting in lesser earnings with a mean difference in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of 1,097.6 CHF (Swiss francs). Conclusions: uRATS and bRATS anatomic lung resections without the use of CO

Indexed as

biportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (bRATS)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)robotic anatomic lung resectionUniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (uRATS)

Identifiers

PMID42232708
PMCPMC13225023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.