Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232699›Full record

ReviewJournal of visualized surgery2024

Paraconduit hernia after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Anna Chudnovets, Kamil A Abbas, Fazil A Abbas, Ghulam Abbas, Sandeep S Kashyap

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of visualized surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna ChudnovetsCAMC Institute of Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA.
Kamil A AbbasWest Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Fazil A AbbasWest Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ghulam AbbasCAMC Institute of Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA.
Sandeep S KashyapCAMC Institute of Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paraconduit hernias, while rare, have garnered increased attention following the adoption of minimally invasive methods for esophagectomy. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is associated with an increased incidence of paraconduit hernia as compared with open esophagectomy. No specific strategies are proven for prevention of paraconduit hernia during the index MIE operation, but recognition of preexisting hiatal hernia, reduction of hernia with excision of the sac, and snug closure of the widened hiatus with non-absorbable suture is recommended. Numerous studies have explored the repair of post-MIE paraconduit hernias, with findings supporting repair for symptomatic patients if the patient is a candidate for surgery. Not all paraconduit hernias necessitate surgical intervention. Many are detected incidentally through radiographic imaging and remain asymptomatic, making them amenable to a watch-and-wait approach. Strict adherence to specific criteria for paraconduit hernia repair is imperative, given a high morbidity rate following repair. Additionally, there remains a significant problem of hernia recurrence after repair. There is no consensus as to the best approach for paraconduit hernia repair, and open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches have all been utilized. This article aims to consolidate and analyze recent research findings, providing surgeons with a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of paraconduit hernias after MIE, and introduce a novel robotic approach for their management.

Indexed as

esophagectomyHiatal hernia (HH)postoperative complicationsrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42232699
PMCPMC13225032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.