ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2024
Thoracoscopic precision excision technique for small non-palpable lesions using radiofrequency identification lung marking system.
Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Stapler Dilemma in VATS Wedge Resection: Are Sutures a Viable Alternative?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- CT-guided Preoperative Localization of Impalpable Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison Between Two Devices.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a thoracoscopic precision excision technique for small, non-palpable lung nodules using a radio frequency identification (RFID) marking system. For peripheral lung nodules, conventional partial resection using an automatic stapler is frequently employed. However, this approach presents challenges for nodules located in deeper regions or near the hilum, as it is often difficult to achieve adequate resection using staplers alone. While segmentectomy offers a viable alternative by providing sufficient margins, it involves extensive dissection around the pulmonary hilum, which can lead to adhesions that complicate future surgeries and restrict surgical options if reoperations are required. The RFID-guided technique proposed in this study enables real-time localization and precise excision of deeply located or hilar-adjacent nodules while minimizing unnecessary parenchymal resection. This method aims to maintain lung function and preserve the feasibility of potential future interventions by limiting hilum manipulation. The procedure incorporates detailed steps, including port placement, RFID marker localization, and precision excision tailored for challenging tumor locations. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative fluoroscopy are utilized to implant the RFID marker via bronchoscopy near the target nodule, allowing for continuous monitoring and controlled resection margins during surgery. Visual aids, such as a port placement figure and a surgical video, support the procedural explanation, demonstrating the use of electrocautery and advanced energy devices to achieve adequate margins without excessive tissue removal. This RFID-guided approach offers a promising alternative for cases where conventional stapler-based techniques are inadequate, particularly for complex anatomical locations. By facilitating precise, minimally invasive resections, this method may represent a significant advancement in thoracoscopic surgery for small pulmonary nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.