Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232691›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2024

Robotic resection of mediastinal masses: a decade of experience.

Désirée Grawunder, Dominik V Flury, Sarah Deckarm, Gregor J Kocher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Désirée Grawunder *University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik V Flury *University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sarah DeckarmUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Gregor J KocherUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining an increasing popularity in the past decades within the field of thoracic surgery, especially in mediastinal tumor resection. In the narrow space of the mediastinum surrounded by a complexity of anatomical structures, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) shows its potential due to its enhanced dexterity, the three-dimensional view with great maneuverability and tremor adjustment in comparison to other minimal invasive techniques. Primary resection is the therapy of choice for most common mediastinal masses in the anterior (thymoma) and posterior (neurogenic tumors) mediastinum. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all robotic-assisted mediastinal tumor resections performed at the Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, between September 2010 and October 2020 from our anonymized database. Resections were performed using the da Vinci robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Results: In total, 124 robotic-assisted resections of mediastinal tumors were performed. One hundred twelve tumors were located in the anterior, one in the middle and eleven in the posterior mediastinum. Thymomas (n=37) and thymic hyperplasias (n=34) have been accountable for 63.39% of all mediastinal masses in the anterior compartment, whereas neurogenic tumors, including schwannoma (n=5), ganglioneuroma (n=2) and neurofibroma (n=1), have been the most common tumors (72.73%) in the posterior mediastinum. Complete resection was achieved in 96.77% (n=120) of cases with an overall conversion rate of 0.81% (n=1). Mean size of resected mediastinal tumors in the anterior mediastinum was 5.16±3.41 and 5.08±2.88 cm for tumors in the posterior mediastinum. For all robotic-assisted mediastinal tumor resections mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 3.45±2.95 days and complications occurred in 12.90% of patients (n=16), with no statistically significant relationship between the different compartments (P=0.68). Postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality rate was 0.00%. Mean follow-up for patients with thymoma, thymic carcinoma, teratoma and metastasis of other cancer (n=44) was 40.00±34.55 months and 5-year follow-up was reached in 34.09% (n=15) of these cases. For these patients, 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 86.67% and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 100%. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has emerged as a promising technique for minimally invasive resection of mediastinal masses. RATS is combining the advantages of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) while overcoming its limitations. Robotic-assisted resection offers a safe and feasible minimally invasive approach for mediastinal masses in all mediastinal compartments. Additionally, RATS shows low conversion rate, high complete resection rate and excellent outcome for masses resected in all compartments of the mediastinum. Our results indicate that RATS has the potential to become the preferred technique for mediastinal tumor resection.

Indexed as

mediastinal massneurogenic tumorsRobotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS)thymoma

Identifiers

PMID42232691
PMCPMC13224996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.