ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Research progress on biomarkers associated with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Clinical Perspectives of Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), resulting from pulmonary surfactant deficiency, continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Conventional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have notable limitations in early warning and prognostic stratification. Consequently, biomarker research has emerged as a promising new direction in this field. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for studies published from January 2010 to December 2025, focusing on those that evaluated the application of inflammatory markers, microRNAs, protein and peptide biomarkers, and lung ultrasound score (LUS) in NRDS. The main findings were as follows: ① inflammatory biomarkers: IL-6, IL-17, and related markers were positively associated with disease severity, although their specificity remained limited; IL-37 showed potential as an anti-inflammatory therapeutic target. ② microRNAs: miR-375, miR-363, and others show better performance when combined with lung ultrasound and blood gas parameters, but this is based on preliminary single-center data. ③ Protein biomarkers: ANGPTL4 has diagnostic and prognostic value; combining it with lung ultrasound increases AUC, but evidence is still early and lacks external validation. ④ Clinical tools: Lung ultrasound, as a non-invasive real-time bedside tool, has good diagnostic performance and is convenient for repeated exams, but its combined use with emerging molecular markers requires further study. ⑤ Machine learning: although it has shown advantages in multimodal data integration, most models still lack external validation, and concerns regarding overfitting and limited interpretability continue to restrict clinical implementation. Overall, combined biomarker strategies and tools like lung ultrasound have shown promise in some studies, but current evidence is insufficient for broader clinical use. Most emerging biomarkers, including miRNAs and peptide markers, face challenges with assay standardization, independent validation, and prospective evaluation. Future studies should aim to translate biomarkers from laboratory discoveries to bedside applications while enhancing the robustness and interpretability of machine learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.