Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232621›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Risk factors associated with growth pain disorder in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ting Luo, Yutong Huang, Yixin Guo, Xianghong Lian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ting LuoDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yutong HuangCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Yixin GuoDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xianghong LianDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the risk factors associated with growth pain disorder (GP) in children and provide an evidence-based reference for its clinical diagnosis and intervention. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched from database inception to Oct 2025 to identify clinical studies investigating risk factors for GP in children. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager (version 5.4), and descriptive analyses were conducted for studies that could not be statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 37 studies involving 16,086 participants and reporting 17 potential risk factors were included. On the basis of the current evidence, compared with healthy children, children with GP had lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations (SMD = -2.75, 95% CI: -3.46 to -2.04; Conclusion: GP in children is affected by multiple factors, and our study offers a valuable reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, owing to the heterogeneity and sample size of the included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. More high-quality prospective studies are needed to further strengthen our understanding of the factors influencing GP in children. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD420251150931.

Indexed as

childrenfactorsgrowth pain disorder (GP)meta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42232621
PMCPMC13223011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.