ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Clinical utility of an evolving cholestasis gene panel in 10,000 children and adults.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cholestasis has diverse causes, with genetic factors playing a key role. Diagnosis is challenging due to varied presentations and overlapping genetic conditions. Next-generation sequencing cholestasis gene panels enable faster, more accurate identification of genetic causes. This study summarizes results from more than 10,000 tests, highlighting their clinical utility. Methods: We analyzed aggregate data from a 77-gene cholestasis panel used between 2016 and 2022. Eligible patients had unexplained cholestasis or chronic liver disease. DNA sequencing utilized custom capture libraries (SureSelect 2016-2021 and PGxome® 2021-2022). Variants were classified per ACMG/AMP guidelines. Definitive diagnoses required biallelic pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in autosomal recessive genes or a single pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in autosomal dominant Results: Of 10,894 samples analyzed, 51.1% were from patients less than 1 year old and 9.2% from those 18 years of age or older. Overall, 2917 patients carried one or more pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant(s). Diagnostic yield was 6.8% for definitive and 2.2% for potential diagnoses. Definitive findings were most common in Conclusions: These cholestasis gene panel results reinforce their value in diagnosing and identifying complex genetic causes of cholestasis, especially in infants less than 1 year old. Early detection supports timely intervention, and the panel provides clearer insight to support accurate diagnoses and inform potential therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.