ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2026
Race, oxygen exposure, and retinopathy of prematurity: re-examining a persistent epidemiologic paradox.
Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness that arises from disrupted retinal vascular development in premature infants. Oxygen exposure remains a central driver of treatment-warranted ROP, as higher saturation levels suppress early retinal vascular growth and later promote pathological neovascularization. Large, randomized trials of oxygen targeting show that lower oxygen saturation ranges reduce the incidence of treatment-requiring ROP, though with trade-offs in mortality. Observational cohorts, including the CRYO-ROP, ETROP, and e-ROP trials, consistently report lower rates of treatment-warranted ROP and reduced treatment need among Black infants despite similar or greater prematurity risk. Multiple explanations have been proposed to account for the paradoxically lower rates of treatment-warranted ROP observed among Black infants. Although biologic variations in angiogenic pathways have been proposed, evidence suggests that structural and clinical factors may offer an alternative explanation for these patterns. Black race is strongly correlated with residence in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage, which is associated with increased risk of prematurity and missed ROP follow-up visits. In addition, pulse oximeters may overestimate oxygen saturation in individuals with darker skin pigmentation, potentially altering targeted oxygen exposure. Survival-related selection bias may further contribute to this paradox, as infants at the highest risk of both mortality and treatment-warranted ROP may not survive long enough to develop treatment-requiring disease. This review examines racial differences in ROP severity and examines how oxygen exposure and structural factors may contribute to these disparities, while acknowledging the limited evidence supporting biologic explanations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.