ArticleThe Lancet. Primary care2025
Integrating oral pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery in primary care family planning clinics: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
Article in The Lancet. Primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04666792 (PrEParing Family Planning Clinics to Streamline Integration of HIV Prevention Services for Young Women in Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PrEParing Family Planning Clinics to Streamline Integration of HIV Prevention Services for Young Women in Kenya
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fidelity of Implementation of Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV in Public Family Planning Clinics in Kenya: Results From a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Integrating pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery in family planning (FP) settings may offer an efficient platform to reach women at elevated risk for HIV. Methods: We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to integrate systematic screening for HIV risk and PrEP delivery in twelve public FP clinics in Kisumu County, Kenya. Clients were HIV-negative women 15-49 years accessing the participating clinics. Each clinic represented a cluster, and four clinics sequentially transitioned from usual care (control) to the intervention period in a randomized staged order every three-month interval. The intervention included provider training and technical support to build FP clinic staff capacity to deliver PrEP as part of the standard of care. There was no masking. Oral PrEP was free to clients. A subset of women assessed to be at elevated HIV risk including those who declined PrEP were enrolled in nested cohort and followed quarterly up to 24 months to measure HIV incidence. The primary outcomes were the proportion of women screened for oral PrEP among those attending FP clinics and PrEP initiation among women screened and assessed to be eligible for PrEP. Analysis was intention-to-treat, with all women not known to be living with HIV at the first clinic visit encounter included in the analysis for the HIV risk and PrEP screening outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov., NCT04666792 and completed. Results: Between March 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, 25457 HIV-negative women visited twelve FP clinics contributing 7386 woman-encounters during control period and 21343 woman-encounters during the intervention period. Median age was 27 (IQR 23-31) years. The proportion of woman-encounters screened for PrEP significantly increased from 2.9% (213/7386) to 91.6% (19560/21343) (relative risk: 20·5, 95%CI 3·5-120.4; p=0·0008). Oral PrEP initiation among women assessed to be at elevated HIV risk increased from 3.9% (5/120) to 40.6% (985/2429) (relative risk: 50·1, 95%CI 2·8-913.4; p=0·0082). Five HIV infections occurred during 833·4 women-years of cohort follow-up (incidence 0.60 95%CI 0.19-1.40 per 100 woman-years). All infections were in women who either declined PrEP (n=3) or had undetectable tenofovir diphosphate in dried blood spots at multiple visits prior to seroconversion (n=2). Interpretation: An implementation intervention package to build capacity of public clinic FP healthcare providers successfully led to integration of oral PrEP delivery in real-world FP clinics in Kenya. These findings could help inform similar strategies in FP clinics in other African settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.