SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
Effects of different menthol administration routes on endurance performance and physiological responses in the heat: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study employed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to systematically evaluate and compare the relative efficacy of three menthol administration routes-ingestion (ING), mouth rinsing (MR), and topical application (Top)-on exercise performance and physiological responses in the heat, aiming to explore potential task-oriented personalized supplementation strategies. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating menthol interventions on exercise performance in hot environments (T≥25 °C), with a search deadline of March 2, 2026. Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0 software. Results: The network meta-analysis of the 15 included randomized controlled trials revealed outcome-specific trends in exercise performance, although most pairwise comparisons did not reach statistical significance. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that ingestion (ING) demonstrated a potential trend for improving endurance performance (SUCRA = 76.1%), while mouth rinsing (MR) showed a tendency for enhancing mean power output (SUCRA = 66.9%). Regarding physiological responses, the impact of all administration routes on core temperature (Tc) and heart rate (HR) was modest and lacked statistically significant differences compared to control conditions. Specifically, ING ranked relatively higher in maintaining core temperature (SUCRA = 67.0%), whereas topical application (Top) exhibited the weakest potential for thermoregulation (SUCRA = 6.2%) and might even lead to a slight upward trend in temperature due to the physical obstruction of heat dissipation. Conclusion: The interventional efficacy of menthol in the heat appears to be co-regulated by the administration route and the specific exercise task. While the current evidence does not establish definitive superiority among the administration routes due to the lack of statistical significance, ingestion may serve as an exploratory option for long-duration endurance events, whereas mouth rinsing could be considered for tasks focusing on instantaneous power output. Given that menthol may mask actual subjective thermal perception without alleviating objective physiological heat strain, its application must be combined with objective physiological monitoring in practice to ensure exercise safety. Systematic Review Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD420261340546.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.