ArticleERJ open research2026
Fourth-generation chemiluminescence QuantiFERON-TB Plus assay
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization recommends screening and providing preventive treatment of tuberculosis in high-risk groups. We compared the performance of the latest versions of two widely used interferon (IFN)-γ release assays (IGRAs), the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus chemiluminescent assay (QFT-Plus CLIA) and the semi-automated T-SPOT.TB assay, and assessed the potential benefit of a dual-testing strategy in immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biological therapy. Methods: From September 2022 to December 2023, we included 3748 immunosuppressed patients. IGRAs were performed according to manufacturers' instructions. Agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa (κ), and subgroup analyses were stratified by age and underlying disease. Results: At least one IGRA was positive in 13.4% of patients (12.0% QFT-Plus CLIA; 9.9% T-SPOT.TB). Indeterminate results were infrequent (1.8% QFT-Plus CLIA; 2.6% T-SPOT.TB). Overall agreement was high (93.0%; κ=0.67), but lower among IGRA-positive cases (63.9%; κ=0.62). Discrepancies occurred in 7.0% of patients, most frequently in children (0-14 years: 15.4%), older adults (≥75 years: 13.8%), individuals living with HIV (38%), rheumatoid arthritis/Sjögren's syndrome (12.4%) and other chronic inflammatory diseases, transplant recipients or immunodeficiencies (11.9%). Among IGRA-positive cases (n=502), most discordant results corresponded to QFT-Plus CLIA-positive/T-SPOT.TB-negative patterns (131 of 181; 72.4%). Conclusion: In immunosuppressed patients, dual IGRA testing enhances diagnostic sensitivity and can strengthen clinical decision-making. Concordant results increase diagnostic certainty, whereas discordant findings gain interpretative value when contextualised by disease group and assay-specific behaviour IGRA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.