ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2026
Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prehospital Prediction Score for Critical Illness Progression and 30-Day Mortality in Non-Traumatic EMS Patients.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early identification of critically ill patients in prehospital emergency settings is essential for timely triage, resource allocation, and destination planning in emergency medical services (EMS). Although several early warning scores have demonstrated utility in emergency department and in-hospital settings, their applicability in prehospital EMS environments remains limited because of operational complexity, variable resource availability, and differences in EMS systems across healthcare settings. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a multivariable prehospital prediction score for critical illness progression and 30-day mortality among non-traumatic EMS patients. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients aged ≥18 years with non-traumatic illnesses transported by the Vajira Emergency Medical Service to the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2024. The primary outcome was illness progression during hospitalization, defined as the requirement for mechanical ventilation, vasopressor and/or inotrope administration, intensive care unit admission, or 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used for model development. Internal validation was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AuROC), with optimal cut-off determined by Youden's index. Survival analysis using parametric Weibull regression was conducted to assess prediction of 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 700 patients were included, of whom 272 (38.9%) developed critical illness. Independent predictors included respiratory rate ≥25 breaths/min, shock index ≥0.9, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤9, endotracheal intubation, and oxygen supplementation. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AuROC 0.765). A cut-off score of 7 stratified patients into low- and high-risk groups, with sensitivity of 63.2% and specificity of 79.7%. Patients in the high-risk group had a 3.44-fold higher risk of 30-day mortality compared with the low-risk group. The model showed strong prognostic performance for mortality (Harrell's C = 0.855). Conclusion: This multivariable prehospital prediction score may support risk stratification, EMS triage prioritization, destination planning, and resource allocation, potentially improving operational efficiency and patient outcomes in high-acuity prehospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.