ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Highly selective visual receptive fields in mouse frontal cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A hallmark of the mammalian visual system is spatial information processing. This relies on feedforward activity spanning multiple brain areas, and on interconnected neurons with spatial receptive fields (RFs) aligned across these areas. This organization allows neurons to iteratively analyze information from the same point of the visual field. It remains unclear if this framework extends beyond the visual system, especially into cognitive areas of frontal cortex that exert feedback control over early sensory areas. Here, we surveyed the mouse frontal cortex (anterior cingulate and secondary motor areas), and discovered neurons with low latency, highly localized visual RFs. Just like in visual cortex, responses were often highly selective for bright or dark stimuli. The responses lagged visual cortical areas by only ~25 ms, and their RFs were comparable in size. Further, the representation of visual space in frontal cortex showed a strong bias for the central (binocular) visual field, but there was no evidence of a topographically organized retinotopic map. Importantly, these visual responses were abolished by optogenetic silencing of visual cortex, revealing a causal role for feedforward hierarchical connectivity that extends visual spatial processing directly into motor and cognitive regions of mouse frontal cortex.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.